Cybersecurity whiz: Combined threats endanger 2020 vote

FILE - In this photo taken Friday, June 8, 2012 Alex Stamos CTO of Artemis Internet, an NCC Group Company, poses by a domain name poster at their offices in San Francisco. Stamos served as chief security officer at Facebook for three years before joining Stanford University, where he studies internet security, including systems related to conducting elections. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)

Alex Stamos served as chief security officer at Facebook for three years before joining Stanford University, where he studies internet security, including systems related to conducting elections.

He warns that there's little the federal government can do now for the 2020 elections. And he laments the arrival of "disinformation as a service," where companies are hired to help spread misinformation on social media.

Stamos spoke recently with The Associated Press. Remarks have been edited for clarity and brevity.

Q. Can you summarize the chilling scenario you recently penned on how the 2020 presidential elections might be thrown into turmoil?

A: Most people focus on specific threats: a technical disruption of voting, social media rumors blaming a conspiracy, extreme media amplifying divisive information. Now imagine combining all three. A not-especially-powerful technical issue could be amplified into a significant election disruption.

Q: There are no real federal election security standards despite expert consensus on how to make elections less hackable, voter-verifiable paper ballots for starters. Government regulation is mostly absent. Is it too late to do anything for 2020?

A: Election authorities are already readying the primaries. It is difficult to imagine what we could do on a federal level to fix these issues at this point.

Q: Why is your outfit at Stanford prioritizing the study of disinformation as a threat to democracy?

A: The Russian playbook is not difficult to implement — and not illegal under many circumstances. The disinformation market is thriving. Domestic actors create fake outlets much as Russian agents did in 2016. Internationally, companies offer disinformation as a service. Foreign money cannot fund domestic electioneering ads. But people whose Facebook and Twitter accounts are deleted for terms of service violations can simply create new accounts and try again.

Q: You worked at Facebook and have a good idea of how disinformation became a problem. Facebook can't seem to get it under control. Why not?

A: Your assumption that "They can't control all this information" is not something I necessarily agree with.

Q: So it can be controlled?

A: An open society like ours is always going to be vulnerable to disinformation. We have a free and open internet. You don't need an ID to open a Twitter or Facebook account. We don't arrest people for spreading disinformation. So, in the last four to five years, a lot of semi-reputable, highly partisan media outlets have emerged that amplify extreme views to try to widen societal divisions. Tech companies, meantime, don't want to be the arbiters of truth, and I think that's reasonable.

Q: The U.S. news media got criticized for how it handled Democratic Party emails stolen in 2016. Has it gotten any better at squelching the weaponization of such information?

A: No. It's a super competitive media environment. Journalists want to be first. There's been very little self-reflection. Tech companies have self-flagellated a lot on these issues. You've seen almost nothing from any flagship media organizations.

Q: Facebook says it won't be fact-checking politicians' speech. Was that a mistake?

A: No. I think it's the right thing. We have to temper our desire for the companies to solve some of these problems with our concern about the power they have. It is reasonable for them to do things like limit access to advertising. It does the most damage, in part because it's targeted. The platforms are able to downgrade inaccurate content. But to artificially downgrade non-paid political speech by candidates is, I think, to give too much power to social media companies that are already spectacularly powerful.

Must Read

China's launch of quantum satellite major step in...

Aug 16, 2016

Experts say China's launch of the first quantum satellite will push forward the worldwide effort to...

BACK TO SCHOOL: Enrollment up a bit as kids...

Aug 16, 2016

The lazy days of summer are ending for millions of children as they grab their backpacks, pencils...

Australia says Vietnam cancels commemoration of...

Aug 17, 2016

Australia is making top-level appeals to Vietnam to lift a sudden ban on veterans commemorating the...

South African vineyard's duck parade doubles as...

Aug 17, 2016

South African vineyard's duck parade doubles as pest control; environmentalists approve

'Auction' of NSA tools sends security companies...

Aug 18, 2016

The leak of what purports to be a National Security Agency tool kit as part of a surreal online...

Trending News

About Us

Started in 2015, Science Of The World offers in-depth news about the latest scientific discoveries. If you’re looking for a reliable source, Science Of The World is the one for you.

Subscribe Now!